A Study on the Linguistic Landscape in Beijing Zoo under the SPEAKING Model
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.62978/2601ly6175Keywords:
Linguistic Landscape, SPEAKING Model, Beijing ZooAbstract
At present, many studies have examined the linguistic landscape (LL). The majority of them target street signs or billboards which usually present only a limited number words; however, fewer studies focus on information boards with more text in public areas. Beijing Zoo not only functions as a tool for popularizing knowledge about animals to the public, but also plays a role in showing the national image of China to the world. This paper takes Chinese-English bilingual LLs in Beijing Zoo as the research object and chooses three elements of the SPEAKING Model, “Genres,” “Norms,” and “Instrumentalities” to analyze these LLs. Field photography, transcription, and comparison are used during the analysis process.
Based on “Genres,” this paper classifies LLs in Beijing Zoo into five categories, including Linguistic Landscapes for Basic Information, Interactive Linguistic Landscapes for Science Popularization, Joint Linguistic Landscapes for Science Popularization, Featured Linguistic Landscapes for Science Popularization, and Other Linguistic Landscapes. Based on “Norms,” this paper looks for errors on LLs, makes corrections, and tries to explore some “hidden norms” embedded in their content. Based on “Instrumentalities,” this paper provides suggestions for the further improvement of LLs in Beijing Zoo by referring to related content of Toronto Zoo and Columbus Zoo.
This research not only widens the research scope of SPEAKING Model, but also attempts to expand the meaning of “Norms” because this paper applies it to both real social scenes and “communities” constructed by different LLs, the latter of which can help to discover the communicative norms in them. This research can help to correct errors on LLs in Beijing Zoo, give guidelines for the further improvement of these LLs, and provide reference value for the quality control of LLs in other zoos.
References
1.Landry, R., & Bourhis, R. Y. (1997). Linguistic landscape and ethnolinguistic vitality: An empirical study. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 16(1), 23–49.
2.Shang, G. W. (2018). Tourism linguistic landscape study: A macro sociolinguistic perspective. Journal of Zhejiang International Studies University, (3), 46–56.
3.Wei, C., Xiao, X. H., & Xu, H. G. (2023). Linguistic landscape and host-guest relationship in international destinations. Human Geography, 38(2), 172–180.
4.Wu, Y. Z., & Zhou, X. E. (2024). Service, culture and aesthetics: A new way to build the linguistic landscape of rural tourism in Guizhou ethnic areas. Guizhou Ethnic Studies, 45(1), 135–141.
5.Wei, H. P., & Zhong, J. L. (2023). Connotation construction and value realization of cultural tourism linguistic landscape in traditional villages of Guangzhou: Taking six typical traditional villages as research objects. Journal of Huaqiao University (Philosophy & Social Sciences), (6), 81–93.
6.Yan, K. (2023). A survey of the language life in Sanshilitun village: From the perspective of rural revitalization. Chinese Journal of Language Policy and Planning, 8(5), 56–65.
7.Fu, Y. R. (2023). A study of language and society in Junying Village of Xiamen. Chinese Journal of Language Policy and Planning, 8(5), 32–44.
8.Tian, Y. X. (2023). A survey study on rural linguistic landscape in Changzhi City. Master’s Thesis of Shenyang Normal University.
9.Zhang, L. W. (2023). A study of rural language life and language services: Based on a language survey in Yaowan Town, Jiangsu Province. Master’s Thesis of Yangzhou University.
10.Li, Y. B. (2023). A study on the “re-historicization” of the linguistic landscape of Barkhor Street. Xizang Studies, (5), 123–133+163.
11.Zeng, L., Zheng, S. L., & Lyu, G. Y. (2023). Spatial-temporal distribution characteristics and evolution logic of inn linguistic landscape in Shuanglang Ancient Town under the tourism development. Tropical Geography, 43(5), 929–944.
12.Wu, X. L., & Zhan, J. (2022). Exploring the linguistic landscape of historical and cultural streets: Focusing on the study of shop name signs. Foreign Languages in China, 19(4), 53–61.
13.Wu, X. L. (2023). The linguistic landscape of historical and cultural streets: A case study of Guangzhou. Doctoral Thesis of Jilin University.
14.Che, C. L. (2022). Research on the construction of worldclass tourist attractions: From the perspective of linguistic landscape internationalization. Social Scientist, (11), 42–48.
15.Liu, Y. F. (2022). A research on the language security of tourism language landscape in ethnic minority areas: Problem and approach. Guizhou Social Sciences, (8), 113–119.
16.Yao, J., Nie, P., & Zhou, L. (2024). Language change and multilingualism in an ethnic city in China: a diachronic linguistic landscape perspective. International Journal of Multilingualism, 1–18.
17.Cabras, G. (2023). Tibetan in the linguistic landscape of Xining (Qinghai Province, Amdo Tibet, Northwest China): a minority language in the context of a monolingual language policy and in a non-autonomous area. International Journal of Multilingualism, 1–25.
18.Motschenbacher, H. (2024). Contrasting a university’s language policy with its linguistic landscape: a Norwegian case study. Current Issues in Language Planning, 25(3), 237–265.
19.Li, S. (2024). Walking on Huaihai Street: liminality, linguistic landscape, and language policy. Journal of Multilingual and Multicultural Development, 1–18.
20.Gu, C. & Almanna, A. (2023). Transl[iter]ating Dubai’s linguistic landscape: a bilingual translation perspective between English and Arabic against a backdrop of globalisation. Applied Linguistics Review.
21.Ike, S., & Hori, Y. (2023). COVID-19 discourse in linguistic landscape: Linguistic and semiotic analysis of directive signs. Australian Journal of Linguistics, 43(4), 375–396.
22.Siham, M. A. (2023). Linguistic Landscape of Arabs in New York City: Application of a Geosemiotics Analysis. ISPRS International Journal of Geo-Information, 12(5), 192.
23.Wang, X., Koh, C. W., Choo, W. Y., & Leong, S. Y. (2023). The revival of Baba culture through linguistic landscape in Malacca, Malaysia. Journal of Multilingual and Multicultural Development, 1–19.
24.Basterretxea Santiso, G. (2023). Linguistic landscape in a rural Basque area: a case study in Ondarroa. International Journal of Multilingualism, 1–19.
25.Li, Y., Mai, Z., & Lau, C. (2023). Linguistic landscape and place-making on a resort island in China. Journal of Tourism and Cultural Change, 21(5), 605–622.
26.Hymes, D. (1972). Models of the interaction of language and social life. In J. J. Gumperz & D. Hymes (Eds.), Directions in Sociolinguistics: The Ethnography of Communication (pp. 35–71). New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.
27.Huebner, T. (2009). “A framework for the linguistic analysis of linguistic landscapes”. In E. Shohamy & D. Gorter (Eds.), LINGUISTIC LANDSCAPE: Expanding the Scenery (pp. 270–283). London: Routledge.
28.Backhaus, P. (2006). Multilingualism in Tokyo: A look into the linguistic landscape. International Journal of Multilingualism, 3(1), 52–66.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Yurun Lou (Author)

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.